Week in Review · Archive

382 stories in.
10 that matter.

The eDiscovery AI stories from the fullest board saved that week.

That week's sweep
#1 FTC instructions set 75 percent recall and precision floors for TAR and AI review, law firm reports (ComplexDiscovery)#2 Has Avoiding Cursed eDiscovery Become Your Obsession? (eDiscovery Today)#3 HaystackID Expands CaseBot Into Agentic AI Case Intelligence With Eight Specialized Skill Agents (EDRM)#4 Court Denies Motion to Prohibit Use of GenAI by Opponents (EDRM)#5 The Kitchen Sink for October 30, 2026: Legal Tech Trends (eDiscovery Today)#6 Your AI Chats May Be Discoverable: Preservation and Privilege Considerations for Generative AI Prompts and Outputs (JD Supra eDiscovery)#7 Pro Se Prompts Privileged – N.Y. Court followed Morgan and Warner; Distinguished Heppner (EDRM)#8 What Does “Human in the Loop” Really Mean?: Artificial Intelligence Best Practices (eDiscovery Today)#9 Hidden AI Instructions in Court Filings Draw First U.S. Judicial Sanctions (JD Supra eDiscovery)#10 Every Prompt Leaves a Record: How Businesses Can Manage Litigation Risk From Everyday AI Use (JD Supra eDiscovery)
  • 382 scanned
  • 63 passed
  • Top 10 of those · hover a dot
Subscribe · freeGet it before your first meeting

The weekly edit · archive

Top 10 for Oct 26 – Nov 1, 2026

The most important eDiscovery AI stories from the seven days to November 1, 2026. Follow the sources for the full story.

How we curate Sources & ranking

A seven-day view of the news.

We scan 11 sources and rank relevant eDiscovery, TAR, AI review, and litigation-tech stories published in the seven days to November 1, 2026. Every headline links to the original reporting.

Scores are out of 100: Recency, Impact, Source, and Topic fit are each worth up to 25. Vendor and event-heavy items receive noise penalties, and items fall off after seven days. Open “Why this story” for each breakdown.

  1. Lead storyPublished the day before this brief

    FTC instructions set 75 percent recall and precision floors for TAR and AI review, law firm reports

    A law firm's account of instructions issued with a recent FTC civil investigative demand and merger second request reports 75 percent recall and precision floors and a 0.50 cutoff for TAR and AI-assisted review, plus full prompt disclosure for AI review, terms the agency's public model second request does not contain.

    ComplexDiscoverycomplexdiscovery.com
    Open source
    Why this story
    Relevance score /10080
    Recency20/25
    Impact17/25
    Source18/25
    Topic fit25/25

    ftc · ediscovery · this week

  2. Story 2Published the day before this brief

    Has Avoiding Cursed eDiscovery Become Your Obsession?

    Today is Halloween! This is my seventeenth(!) year (seventh on this blog) to identify stories to try to “scare” you with tales of eDiscovery, data privacy, cybersecurity information governance and AI horrors because it is, after all, an eDiscovery blog. Let’s see how I do this year. Some people are cursed when it comes to.

    eDiscovery Todayediscoverytoday.com
    Open source
    Why this story
    Relevance score /10075
    Recency20/25
    Impact10/25
    Source20/25
    Topic fit25/25

    privacy · ediscovery · this week

  3. Story 3Published 3 days before this brief

    HaystackID Expands CaseBot Into Agentic AI Case Intelligence With Eight Specialized Skill Agents

    HaystackID®, a trusted partner focused on managing complex data and workflow challenges in legal, compliance, regulatory and cybersecurity environments, today announced that CaseBot™ is now available as agentic AI case intelligence, with eight Specialized Skill Agents that help legal teams explore evidence, investigate complex.

    EDRMedrm.net
    Open source
    Why this story
    Relevance score /10073
    Recency14/25
    Impact18/25
    Source22/25
    Topic fit19/25

    regulatory · ediscovery · primary or standards source

  4. Story 4Published 3 days before this brief

    Court Denies Motion to Prohibit Use of GenAI by Opponents

    A court recently addressed Defendants’ Joint Motion for an Order Prohibiting the Use of Generative AI. The Defendants relied on Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 and the court’s common-law inherent authority to support their motion for “an order prohibiting the use of artificial intelligence in the preparation of any filings submitted to the.

    EDRMedrm.net
    Open source
    Why this story
    Relevance score /10065
    Recency13/25
    Impact15/25
    Source22/25
    Topic fit15/25

    court · generative ai · primary or standards source

  5. Story 5Published 2 days before this brief

    The Kitchen Sink for October 30, 2026: Legal Tech Trends

    This week’s kitchen sink for October 30, 2026 (with meme from Gates Dogfish) discusses Weil’s impending demise, AI attacking mosquitoes & more!

    eDiscovery Todayediscoverytoday.com
    Open source
    Why this story
    Relevance score /10065
    Recency17/25
    Impact3/25
    Source20/25
    Topic fit25/25

    ai · ediscovery

  6. Story 6Published 3 days before this brief

    Your AI Chats May Be Discoverable: Preservation and Privilege Considerations for Generative AI Prompts and Outputs

    As generative AI tools become part of everyday business and legal work, a pressing question for litigants is whether prompts, outputs, and conversation logs must be preserved and produced in litigation. Recent decisions suggest that AI interactions are generally treated like any other electronically stored information (ESI),.

    JD Supra eDiscoveryjdsupra.com
    Open source
    Why this story
    Relevance score /10063
    Recency14/25
    Impact10/25
    Source15/25
    Topic fit24/25

    privilege · privilege

  9. Story 9Published 2 days before this brief

    Hidden AI Instructions in Court Filings Draw First U.S. Judicial Sanctions

    In August, a Connecticut Superior Court issued what appears to be the first reported U.S. judicial sanction for prompt injection in litigation, and the decision carries consequences that extend well beyond the self-represented plaintiff who triggered it.... By: Hicks Johnson

    JD Supra eDiscoveryjdsupra.com
    Open source
    Why this story
    Relevance score /10061
    Recency18/25
    Impact20/25
    Source15/25
    Topic fit8/25

    court · litigation

  10. Story 10Published 2 days before this brief

    Every Prompt Leaves a Record: How Businesses Can Manage Litigation Risk From Everyday AI Use

    Use of artificial intelligence (AI) may have significant implications in litigation. AI prompts, outputs and conversation histories may be requested in discovery, and companies may need to preserve relevant AI records once litigation is reasonably anticipated.... By: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

    JD Supra eDiscoveryjdsupra.com
    Open source
    Why this story
    Relevance score /10061
    Recency17/25
    Impact10/25
    Source15/25
    Topic fit19/25

    prompt · discovery

Looking for this week?Read the current Week in Review